Home Blog NIFTY: Dynamic Asset Allocation Index Series
Blog

NIFTY: Dynamic Asset Allocation Index Series

– Employing dynamic asset allocation strategy based on market valuation

 

Introduction

It’s often said that cricket is a game of uncertainties. The rule of ‘one size fits all’ doesn’t alwayswork. The game tests the mettle of the players during various phases. The game demands batsmento ‘take the bull by its horns’ when bowlers run the show and make merry when the situation turns favorable. Best players are the ones that can adapt to any situation and use it to their advantage.

Similar to the game of cricket, in unpredictable environment in capital markets, investors are often grappled with a common question – how can one potentially sail through various phases of uncertainty? Right asset allocation strategy often plays a critical role in achieving this. Asset allocation revolves around finding the right balance between various asset classes such as Equity (which has the potential to generate higher returns with higher risk) and Fixed Income (with relatively lower risk and range bound returns).

The new NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation index series (NIFTY DAA) presently consist of 2 indices namely NIFTY 50 & Short Duration Debt – Dynamic P/E index & NIFTY 50 & Short Duration Debt – Dynamic P/B index. With their dynamic and rule-based asset allocation mechanism, these indices are designed to tactically combine ‘best of two worlds’ (Equity and Debt). The unique asset allocation model cuts exposure to equity when markets turn expensive and accordingly assigns higher weight to debt, thereby seeking to limit downside risk. Similarly, the design of the model is intelligent enough to align higher weight towards equity when markets turn relatively cheaper, offering higher potential upside. Thus, NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation indices present an ideal fit for investors desirous of stable risk-adjusted returns and are suited for benchmarking needs of Dynamic Asset Allocation funds.

 

About NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices:

The NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices individually capture the performance of hybrid portfolios where asset is allocated among:

i) NIFTY 50 TR Index (equity component),

ii) NIFTY Short Duration Debt index (debt component),

iii) NIFTY 50 TR Index with Short NIFTY 50 Futures index (arbitrage component)

iv) CBLO based on Price-Earnings ratio (P/E) or Price-Book ratio (P/B) of NIFTY 50.

b1

 

As mentioned earlier, The NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices presently consist of 2 indices namely NIFTY 50 & Short Duration Debt – Dynamic P/E index and NIFTY 50 & Short Duration Debt – Dynamic P/B index. Within these indices, asset allocation between equity and debt is based on either Price-Earnings ratio (P/E) or Price-Book ratio (P/B) of NIFTY 50 index.

Exhibit 2: Asset Allocation rationale for NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices

Scenario

Asset Allocation

Market is relatively expensive

Lower allocation to Equity (Higher allocation to Debt)

Market is relatively cheaper

Higher allocation to Equity (Lower allocation to Debt)

 

Asset Allocation rules:

  • Equity allocation (NIFTY 50 TR) is determined by an asset allocation model which compares the current value of P/E or P/B of NIFTY 50 with the average, maximum and minimum P/E or P/B of NIFTY 50 in previous 7 years
  • Maximum allocation to equity component is 80% and minimum allocation is 65% including arbitrage
  • In case, the model prescribes an allocation to equity that is lower than 65%, the equity arbitrage is used to maintain the equity allocation at 65%. Arbitrage is done by giving equal allocation to Long NIFTY 50 TR index and Short NIFTY 50 Futures index
  • Remaining allocation is given to debt component (NIFTY Short duration debt index), hence maximum allocation to debt (including CBLO) component is 35% and minimum allocation is 20%
  • In case arbitrage is used, 10% of the asset allocated to NIFTY 50 Futures index (short) is allocated to NIFTY 1D Rate index (CBLO component) in order to capture the margin requirement
  • The asset allocation in the index is rebalanced on a monthly basis
  • The month over month change in allocation to equity component (NIFTY 50 TR, excluding arbitrage component) by asset allocation model at the time of rebalancing is capped at 10%

b2

NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices achieved higher risk-adjusted returns and witnessed lower drawdowns during phases of market downturn

Exhibit 4 below shows the performance of NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices vis-à-vis NIFTY 50 TR & NIFTY Short Duration Debt Index.

b3

Drawdown refers to the peak to trough decline during a specific period of investment. It is reported as the drop from peak to subsequent trough in percentage terms. (Indicated in Exhibit 4 above). For instance in calendar year 2008, NIFTY 50 & Short Duration Debt – Dynamic P/E index dropped from peak value of 1519.7 on August 11, 2008 to trough of 1098.5 on November 20, 2008 and hence the drawdown for the calendar year 2008 is -27.7%.

b4

Exhibit 5 above shows the calendar year-wise drawdowns of NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices and NIFTY 50 TR. Highest drawdowns recorded by NIFTY 50 & Short Duration Debt –Dynamic P/E index and NIFTY 50 Dynamic Short Duration Debt – P/B indices were -25.2% & -27.7% respectively during financial crisis of 2008 as against -45.2% of NIFTY 50 TR observed during the same period. Similar instance is also observed during slowdown of 2011 when NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation indices fell lesser than NIFTY 50 TR. On overall basis, out of 14 calendar years, NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation indices recorded lower drawdowns compared to NIFTY 50 TR in all instances indicating relatively robust performance of NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation indices during periods of market correction/downturn.

b5

Exhibit 6 above captures the annualized returns, volatility and return-risk ratio of NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices, NIFTY 50 TR & NIFTY Short Duration Debt Index. NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices registered higher return-risk ratio in comparison to NIFTY 50 TR across all investment horizons on account of much lower volatility (highlighted in ‘green’ in Exhibit 6). Whereas, NIFTY Short Duration Debt Index has delivered higher return-risk ratio in comparison to NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices, the returns of NIFTY Short Duration Debt Index are lower across all investment horizons amid lower volatility. Thus, NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices, with their unique market valuation linked asset allocation design, represent an ideal fit between equity and debt assets.

b6

Analysis of calendar year-wise performance highlights that not only did NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices perform well in bear markets but also during the recovery phase of the equity market. During the financial crisis of 2008, NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices fell lesser (NIFTY 50 & Short Duration Debt – Dynamic P/E index : -20.1% and NIFTY Dynamic Short Duration Debt – P/B Index: -21.5%) than NIFTY 50 TR (-51.3%) during market downturn in 2008 (highlighted in red in Exhibit 7). Similar observation was made in 2011. In recovery phase of 2009, NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices gave decent returns in relation to NIFTY 50 TR index amid significantly lower volatility. For a prudent investor, who is not only conscious about returns but equally about risk-adjusted returns, dynamic asset allocation strategy offered by NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices is an apt investment strategy.

 

On rolling return basis, NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices have consistently delivered healthy absolute returns

Rolling return analysis was conducted to eliminate recency bias in performance. Figures in Exhibits 8 & 9 below show number of instances of for various ranges of absolute returns delivered by NIFTY 50 & Short Duration Debt – Dynamic P/B index and by NIFTY 50 & Short Duration Debt – Dynamic P/E index.

b7

As can be observed in Exhibits 8 & 9, NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation Indices have always (100% of the times) delivered absolute returns of >7% for an investment horizon of 5 & 7 years. For shorter time horizon of 1, 2 and 3 years, NIFTY 50 & Short Duration Debt – Dynamic P/B index delivered >7% absolute returns in 74%, 77% and 87% of the times respectively. For the same investment period, NIFTY 50 & Short Duration Debt – Dynamic P/E index delivered >7% absolute returns in 76%, 79% and 90% of the times respectively. Both NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation indices have delivered very few instances of negative absolute returns for shorter than 3 year investment horizons.

 

Conclusion:

Each index strategy has its unique strengths and limitations. There is seldom a single investment strategy that can outshine others consistently in all market conditions. Investment decisions often revolve around finding the right balance between various asset classes such as Equity, Equity Arbitrage and Debt to sail through unpredictable market conditions.

NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation indices provide a dynamic, rule-based asset allocation mechanism that intend to tactically combine the unique benefits of Equity, Equity arbitrage and Debt asset classes. NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation indices have consistently delivered stable risk adjusted returns across multiple investment horizons. These indices have lower drawdowns compared to NIFTY 50 TR index, underlining the robustness in performance especially during periods of market downturns.

Dynamic asset allocation design of NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation indices has delivered healthy & stable absolute returns. NIFTY Dynamic Asset Allocation indices is an ideal fit for investors seeking stable risk-adjusted returns over long term investment horizons and well-suited for benchmarking needs of Dynamic Asset Allocation funds.


About the Author:

Shulin Image NEW

Mr. Shulin Satoskar, is currently the Deputy Manager, Products Development at NSE. He is a distinguished alum from TAPMI, Manipal, batch of 2014-16.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Do we still need Credit Cards?

Editor – Swetha TM || Why hasn’t the credit card died, despite...

Crude Behavior: From Art to Activism

Editor – Ankita Kumari || Introduction: In the world of art, where...

Ayodhya’s Growth Story: From Temple to Tourism Hub

Editor – Ankita Kumari || In the heart of India, Ayodhya, a...